文章摘要

人工全髋关节置换术治疗成人股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨头坏死

作者: 1李怀木, 1方玮, 1韩雪昆, 1高贤, 2徐兴全
1 南京梅山医院骨科,南京 210039
2 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院骨科,南京 210008
通讯: 李怀木 Email: lihuaimu@126.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.11.019

摘要

目的:比较人工全髋关节置换术治疗成人股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨头坏死和非创伤性股骨头坏死的疗效。方法:回顾分析自2015年1月至2016年6月应用全髋关节置换术治疗成人股骨颈骨折内固定术后股骨头坏死14例(创伤组),同期人工全髋关节置换术治疗非创伤性股骨头坏死30例(对照组)。对比两组股骨头坏死分期,髋关节功能Harris评分。手术时间,术中出血量,术后引流量,术后臼杯外展角,臼杯前倾角,术后3,6,12个月髋关节功能Harris评分,并发症的发生率。结果:两组随访时间15~36(平均23.6)个月,无髋关节感染,假体周围骨折、松动,异位骨化等并发症发生。创伤组1例术后发生腓肠肌肌间静脉丛血栓形成。对照组2例发生腓肠肌间静脉丛血栓形成,1例发生髋关节脱位。术后髋关节功能显著改善(P<0.01)。两组手术时间[(99.6±9.85) min vs (96.6±7.68) min,t=0.52,P=0.64],术中失血量[(220±94.3) mL vs (217±89.9) mL,t=0.79,P=0.99],臼杯外展角(P>0.05),臼杯前倾角及术后3,6,12个月髋关节功能Harris评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:人工全髋关节置换术治疗股骨颈内固定术后股骨头缺血坏死可取得良好的效果,与非创伤性股骨头坏死相比,手术难度和并发症发生率无明显差异。
关键词: 骨折;股骨颈;内固定;股骨头坏死;髋关节置换

Total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture in adults

Authors: 1LI Huaimu, 1FANG Wei, 1HAN Xuekun, 1GAO Xian, 2XU Xingquan
1 Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Meishan Hospital, Nanjing 210039, China
2 Department of Orthopedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China

CorrespondingAuthor: LI Huaimu Email: lihuaimu@126.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.11.019

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture and non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults. Methods: From January 2015 to June 2016, a retrospective study was performed on 44 cases of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Trauma group was 14 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture, Control group was 30 patients with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. The disease course, stage of Ficat classification and Harris score, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, acetabular abduction, anteversion, Harris score at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month, incidence after surgery were compared among groups. Results: All patients were followed up, the average time was 23.6 months, from 15 to 36 months. Without hip infection, periprosthetic fracture, loosening, heterotopic ossification and other complications, Trauma group: 1 case had intravenous gastrocnemius embolism. Control group: 2 cases had intravenous embolism and 1 case had dislocation of hip joint. Hip joint function improved significantly after surgery (P<0.01). The operative time of two groups was [(99.6±9.85) min vs (96.6±7.68), t=0.52, P=0.64], intraoperative blood loss [(220±94.3) mL vs (217±89.9) mL, t=0.79, P=0.99], acetabular abduction (P>0.05), anteversion (P>0.05) and Harris score (P>0.05) at the 3rd, 6th and 12th month after surgery ,the differences were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion: The result is satisfactory of total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture. Compared with non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head, there is no significant difference in operative difficulty and incidence.
Keywords: fracture; femoral neck; internal fixation; osteonecrosis of the femoral head; total hip arthroplasty

文章选项