渐进性肌肉放松训练对下肢骨折术后早期康复的影响
作者: |
1张敏佳,
1林松庆,
1吕莉,
1刘海玲,
1曾春菊
1 解放军福州总医院第二住院部骨一科二区,福州 350025 |
通讯: |
张敏佳
Email: fzzmj2011@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.06.022 |
基金: | 福建省科技厅军民共建 ( 社发 ) 引导性项目 (2016Y5002) |
摘要
目的:探讨渐进性肌肉放松训练(progressive muscle rela xation training,PMRT)对下肢骨折术后康复的影响。方法:前瞻性纳入下肢胫腓骨骨折患者120例,随机分为PMRT组和对照组,各60例。2组均实施手术复位固定,术后对照组给予常规治疗护理,PMRT组在常规治疗护理基础上接受PMRT,每天2次,每次30 min。对比干预前、干预1周后,采用Zung焦虑自评量表(Self-rating Anx iety Scale,SAS)评估患者焦虑状况,采用视觉模拟评分法(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)评估患者疼痛状况,对比2组术后开始患肢肌肉舒缩活动的时间和术后补救性镇痛比例,通过测量患肢周径评估患者术后肢体肿胀程度。结果:干预前,2组一般资料、术前SAS、VAS疼痛评分和患肢周径差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。干预后,PMRT组SAS评分(30.8±4.1 vs 33.5±4.7,t=3.353, P=0.001)和VAS疼痛评分(3.1±1.4 vs 3.9±1.7,t=2.814,P=0.006)显著小于对照组,开始患肢肌肉舒缩活动的时间[(21.8±7.5) h vs (25.4±8.2) h,t=2.509,P=0.013]显著早于对照组,补救性镇痛比例(18.3% vs 36.7%,χ2=5.057,P=0.025)显著低于对照组,患肢周径[(37.4±1.8) cm vs (38.3±2.1) cm, t=2.521,P=0.013]差异小于对照组。结论:PMRT可以减轻下肢骨折术后焦虑、疼痛症状,改善患肢肿胀程度,为术后早期功能锻炼创造有利条件,有助于术后康复。
关键词:
渐进性肌肉放松训练;下肢骨折;胫腓骨骨折
Effect of progressive muscle relaxation training on postoperative rehabilitation of lower extremity fracture
CorrespondingAuthor: ZHANG Minjia Email: fzzmj2011@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.06.022
Foundation: This work was supported by the Civil Military Construction (Social Development) Guiding Project of Fujian Provincial Science and Technology Department, China (2016Y5002)
Abstract
Objective: To explore the effect of Progressive muscle relaxation training (PMRT) on the postoperative rehabilitation of lower limb fracture. Methods: One hundred and twenty patients with tibia and fibula fracture were randomly divided into a PMRT group and a control group (n=60 in each group). The 2 groups were all performed surgical reduction and fixation. After the operation, the control group received routine treatment and nursing. Group PMRT received PMRT on the basis of conventional treatment, 2 times a day, 30 min each time. The anxiety state was assessed by Zung Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). The level of pain was measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The time of starting muscle relaxation and remedial action after the operation and the proportion of postoperative remedial analgesia were compared between the 2 groups. The degree of limb swelling after surgery was assessed by measuring the circumferential diameter of the affected limb. Results: Before the intervention, there was no statistical significance between the 2 groups of general data, preoperative SAS, VAS pain scores and circumferential limb diameter (P>0.05). The SAS score (30.8±4.1 vs 33.5±4.7, t=3.353, P=0.001) and VAS pain score (3.1±1.4 vs 3.9±1.7, t=2.814, P=0.006) in the PMRT group were significantly lower than those in the control group. The time of starting limb muscle contractions [(21.8±7.5) h vs (25.4±8.2) h, t=2.509, P=0.013] in the PMRT group was significantly earlier than that in the control group. The remedial analgesic ratio (18.3% vs 36.7%, χ2=5.057, P=0.025) in the PMRT group was significantly lower than that in the control group. The limb circumference [(37.4±1.8) cm vs (38.3±2.1) cm, t=2.521, P=0.013] in the PMRT group were less than that in the control group. Conclusion: PMRT can reduce the postoperative anxiety and pain symptoms, improve the swelling degree of the affected limb, create favorable conditions for early postoperative functional exercise, and contribute to postoperative rehabilitation.
Keywords:
progressive muscle relaxation training; lower extremity fracture; tibia and fibula fracture