文章摘要

无创呼吸机在已经出现呼吸肌疲劳但不伴有呼吸衰竭的AECOPD患者中的应用价值

作者: 1戴思平, 1李芳华
1 惠州市第三人民医院急诊科,广东 惠州 516002
通讯: 戴思平 Email: dp5160029096@sina.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.08.021

摘要

目的:探讨无创呼吸机在已经出现呼吸肌疲劳但不伴有呼吸衰竭的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期(acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,AECOPD)患者中的应用价值。方法:选取2013年12月至2015年12月我院收治的138例已经出现呼吸肌疲劳但不伴有呼吸衰竭的AECOPD患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法将患者分为研究组和对照组,每组69例。对照组患者进行抗感染、吸氧、祛痰、维持电解质酸碱平衡等常规治疗,研究组在对照组基础上加用无创呼吸机治疗。综合比较两组患者治疗前后肺功能、血气分析情况、呼吸肌功能、呼吸困难程度及患者耐受性的差异。结果:治疗前,两组FEV1、FVC、FEV1/FVC等比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后,研究组FEV1、FEV1/FVC比对照组高(P<0.05)。治疗前,两组血气分析各指标比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05);治疗后30 min,两组PO2、PCO2、SaO2、pH等各指标均比治疗前明显改善P<0.05)。治疗后,组间血气分析指标比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。研究组呼吸肌功能评分高于对照组(P<0.05),mMRC评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。患者耐受性好,无退出治疗病例。结论:无创呼吸机在治疗已经出现呼吸肌疲劳但不伴有呼吸衰竭的AECOPD疗效好,能有效患者改善呼吸功能,缓解呼吸困难症状,预防呼吸衰竭。
关键词: 无创呼吸机 呼吸肌疲劳 呼吸衰竭 AECOPD 血气分析

Clinical value of non-invasive ventilation for AECOPD respiratory muscle fatigue patients without respiratory exhaustion

Authors: 1DAI Siping, 1LI Fanghua
1 Department of Emergency, the Third People’s Hospital of Huizhou, Huizhou Guangdong 516002, China

CorrespondingAuthor: DAI Siping Email: dp5160029096@sina.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.08.021

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of non-invasive ventilation for respiratory muscle fatigue acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients without respiratory exhaustion. Methods: 138 cases respiratory muscle fatigue AECOPD patients in our hospital were randomly divided into research group and control group, 69 cases in each group. Control group were treated with antibiotics, oxygen, expectorant, maintaining electrolyte acid-base balance treatment. Research group were treated with non-invasive ventilation based on control group’s treatment. The pulmonary function, blood gas analysis results, respiratory muscle function, dyspnea level and treatment tolerance of the two groups were compared. Results: There was no significant difference in pulmonary function between the two groups before treatment (P>0.05). After treatment, FEV1, FEV1/FVC of research group were higher than that in control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in PO2, PCO2, SaO2, pH, which stand for blood gas analysis between the two groups, neither before treatment nor after treatment (P>0.05). The dyspnea level (mMRC score) of research group was lower than that of control group (P<0.05), while respiratory muscle function was higher (P<0.05). All patients had good tolerance for their treatment. Conclusion: Non-invasive ventilation has exact effect for respiratory muscle fatigue AECOPD patients without respiratory exhaustion. It could improve patients’ respiratory function and ease dyspnea, safeguard respiratory failure as well.

文章选项