全程护理干预模式对雾化治疗的学龄期哮喘患儿生命体征和临床症状的影响
作者: |
1朱迎霞
1 应城市人民医院门诊办公室,湖北 应城 432400 |
通讯: |
朱迎霞
Email: zhuyingxias@163.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.07.017 |
摘要
目的:探讨及研究全程护理干预模式对雾化治疗的学龄期哮喘患儿生命体征和临床症状的影响及治疗效果。方法:选取112例2015年8月至2016年2月来我院诊治的学龄期哮喘患儿为研究对象,随机分为全程护理干预组(A组,n=56)和常规护理干预组(A组,n=56)。患者均采用氧驱动雾化吸入治疗后,A组患者给予全程护理干预,B组患者给予传统常规护理干预,观察比较两组患者干预前后生命体征、护理后症状评分及护理工作满意度等情况。结果:A组患者在全程护理干预模式背景下,症状得到改善,生命体征以及日间和夜间症状评分均优于传统常规护理组(P<0.05);A组满意率为98.3%相较于B组满意率83.4%,两者满意度差异大(P<0.05)。结论:采用全程护理模式干预氧驱动雾化吸入治疗的学龄期哮喘儿童,可改善患儿生命体征和临床症状,全程护理干预模式值得在相关临床活动中应用与推广。
关键词:
全程护理干预
常规护理干预
学龄期哮喘
雾化治疗
Influence of vital signs and clinical symptoms of whole course nursing intervention mode on school-aged asthma children with nebulization therapy
CorrespondingAuthor: ZHU Yingxia Email: zhuyingxias@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.07.017
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of vital signs and clinical symptoms of whole course nursing intervention mode on school-aged children with nebulization therapy and clinical efficacy. Methods: 112 school-aged asthma patients admitted to our hospital from August 2015 to February 2016 were distributed to whole course nursing intervention mode group (A group, n=56) and routine nursing intervention mode group (B group, n=56) randomly. In A group, our experiment using whole course nursing intervention after the school-aged asthma children treated with nebulization therapy, while in B group, it used routine nursing intervention after the treated with nebulization therapy. Compared the vital signs and clinical symptoms and the satisfaction after intervened by using the two methods, respectively. Results: Under the whole course nursing intervention mode condition, the change of clinical symptoms, vital signs (such as blood oxygen saturation, heart rate, breathing) and the scores of daytime and nighttime symptom were better than the routine nursing intervention mode condition, with significant differences (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the rate of satisfaction in whole course nursing intervention mode group patients was 98.3%, which was significant higher than the routine nursing intervention mode group patients with the rate of satisfaction in patients was 83.4% (P<0.05). Conclusion: Whole course nursing intervention mode on school-aged asthma children with nebulization therapy can change the clinical symptoms, vital signs, treatment compliance and satisfaction, which is deserve to popularize and apply in clinic treatment associated with the symptoms of asthma.