射频消融术治疗老年早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效
作者: |
1何灵慧,
2黄灿红,
3丁勇生
1 南通市肿瘤医院内科,江苏 南通 226000 2 南通市肿瘤医院放疗科,江苏 南通 226000 3 南通市肿瘤医院影像科,江苏 南通 226000 |
通讯: |
丁勇生
Email: 393950116@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.11.013 |
摘要
Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation on senile patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer
CorrespondingAuthor: DING Yongsheng Email: 393950116@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.11.013
Abstract
Objective: To explore the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of elderly patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: A total of 64 patients ≥60 years old patients with stage Ia (T1N0M0) NSCLC who visited Nantong Cancer Hospital from January 2018 to January 2022 were enrolled as research subjects. Among them, the patients who received RFA treatment were selected as a RFA group (n=34), and the patients who received stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) were selected as a SBRT group (n=30). After the treatment, the curative effect, complications, and prognosis between the 2 groups were analyzed and compared. Results: After the first RFA treatment, the complete ablation rate and partial ablation rate of RFA group were 91.18% (31/34) and 8.82% (3/34), respectively. The ablation effect was good. Six months after the operation, the short-term efficacy between the 2 groups was evaluated. The results showed that the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the RFA group were 82.35% and 91.18%, respectively. The ORR and DCR of SBRT group were 83.33% and 91.18%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year recurrence rates in the RFA group were slightly higher than those in the SBRT group, but there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (8.82% vs 6.67%, 14.71% vs 13.33%, 25.53% vs 23.33%, all P>0.05). The PFS of RFA group was (34.68±0.60) months, 95%CI 33.51 to 35.83. PFS of SBRT group was (31.69±1.23) months, 95%CI 29.88 to 34.10. PFS of RFA group was significantly longer than that of SBRT group (P=0.047). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The results of logistic analysis showed that tumor diameter was an independent risk factor affecting the occurrence of complications (P<0.05), and the risk of complications in patients with larger tumor diameter was 7.437 times that in patients with smaller tumor diameter. Conclusion: The efficacy of RFA in the treatment of elderly patients with early-stage NSCLC is similar to that of currently commonly used SBRT. RFA treatment can achieve good efficacy and high safety, but complications such as pneumothorax may also occur. Therefore, clinicians need to carefully select treatment options based on the patient's tumor diameter.