文章摘要

血管栓塞介入和颅内夹闭术治疗世界神经外科联盟IV~V级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的回顾性队列研究

作者: 1王爱珠, 1何珠茹, 1曾维培, 1梁琬苡, 2许琼冠
1 琼海市人民医院神经外科,海南 琼海 571400
2 海南医学院第二附属医院神经外科,海口 570216
通讯: 许琼冠 Email: xqg84@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.12.008
基金: 海南省卫生健康行业科研项目(21A200119)。

摘要

目的:探讨血管栓塞介入和颅内夹闭术在世界神经外科联盟(World Federation of Neurosurgery,WFNS) IV~V级动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage,aSAH)外科治疗中的临床获益差异。方法:回顾性分析2019年4月至2021年9月在琼海市人民医院神经外科住院治疗的134例WFNS IV~V级aSAH患者相关资料,依据接受治疗手段不同,分成栓塞介入组(n=64)与颅内夹闭组(n=70),对两组手术情况和术后3个月随访情况进行比较。结果:栓塞介入组手术时间、住院时间均短于颅内夹闭组(均P<0.05),脑血管痉挛(cerebral angiospasm,CVS)为4.69%、并发症总发生率为10.94%,均低于颅内夹闭组的15.71%、25.71%(均P<0.05)。术后3个月,栓塞介入组预后良好率为70.31%,高于颅内夹闭组的52.86%(P<0.05),认知障碍发生率为45.31%,低于颅内夹闭组的62.86%(P<0.05)。结论:与颅内夹闭术治疗WFNS IV~V级aSAH相比,血管栓塞术不仅具有节省手术耗时、缩短住院时间和降低CVS等并发症的优点,而且在改善患者近期预后和减少认知损害方面也具有明显优势,可提高临床获益。
关键词: 动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血;高分级;血管栓塞介入术;颅内夹闭术;回顾性队列研究

Vascular embolization and intracranial clipping in the treatment of World Federation of Neurosurgery grade IV–V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A retrospective cohort study

Authors: 1WANG Aizhu, 1HE Zhuru, 1ZENG Weipei, 1LIANG Wanyi, 2XU Qiongguan
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Qionghai People’s Hospital, Qionghai Hainan 571400, China
2 Department of Neurosurgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou 570216, China

CorrespondingAuthor: XU Qiongguan Email: xqg84@163.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.12.008

Foundation: This work was supported by the Hainan Provincial Health Industry Scientific Research Project, China (21A200119).

Abstract

Objective: To explore the clinical benefits of vascular embolization and intracranial clipping in the surgical treatment of grade IV–V aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) of the World Federation of Neurosurgery (WFNS). Methods: The data of 134 patients with WFNS grade IV–V aSAH hospitalized in the Department of Neurosurgery of Qionghai People’s Hospital from April 2019 to September 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. According to different treatment methods, they were divided into an embolization group (n=64) and an intracranial clipping group (n=70). The operation and 3-month follow-up of the 2 groups were classified and compared. Results: The operation time and hospital stay in the embolization group were shorter than those in the intracranial clipping group (both P<0.05). The incidence of cerebral vasospasm (CVS) was 4.69%, and the total incidence of complications was 10.94%, which was lower than 15.71% and 25.71% in the intracranial clipping group (both P<0.05). Three months after the operation, the good prognosis rate in the embolization group was 70.31%, which was higher than 52.86% in the intracranial clipping group (P<0.05), and the incidence of cognitive impairment was 45.31%, which was lower than 62.86% in the intracranial clipping group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with intracranial clipping in the treatment of WFNS grade IV–V aSAH, vascular embolization not only has the advantages of saving operation time, shortening hospital stay, and reducing CVS and other complications, but also may have obvious advantages in improving the short-term prognosis and reducing cognitive damage, so as to improve the clinical benefit.

Keywords: aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; high grade; vascular embolization; intracranial clipping; retrospective cohort study

文章选项