文章摘要

两种镇静药物对颅内出血患者肾功能和全身性炎症反应的影响

作者: 1左和平, 1张浩, 1江灿灿, 1李景荣
1 安徽医科大学第二附属医院急诊重症监护室,合肥 230601
通讯: 李景荣 Email: 412201761@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.08.017
基金: 安徽医科大学校科研基金(2019xkj134)。

摘要

目的:比较丙泊酚和右美托咪定镇静对颅内出血(intracranial hemorrhage,ICH)患者肾功能的影响,并探讨相关的机制。方法:选择2020年1月至2021年12月在安徽医科大学第二附属医院重症监护室(intensive care unit,ICU)入住的80例ICH患者,随机分为丙泊酚镇静组(P组)和右美托咪定镇静组 (D组),每组40例,P组患者接受15 min内给予1 mg/kg的丙泊酚负荷剂量,后续以1~3 mg/(kg·h)维持剂量进行镇静治疗;D组患者接受15 min内给予1.5 μg/kg的右美托咪定负荷剂量,后续以0.6 μg/(kg·h)维持剂量进行镇静治疗。记录所有患者的一般资料,分别在用药前(T0)、用药后12 h(T1)、用药后24 h(T2)抽取血浆并利用酶联免疫吸附测定法(enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)测定两组患者血浆白细胞介素-6、降钙素原和血肌酐的水平。结果:相较于T0,在T1和T2时点,两组患者的白细胞介素-6、降钙素原和血肌酐表达水平均明显升高;组间比较两组患者在T1和T2时点的白细胞介素-6、降钙素原的表达水平均无差异;在T1和T2时点,P组患者的血肌酐表达水平均显著高于D组患者。结论:与丙泊酚镇静相比,右美托咪定镇静能够显著降低ICH患者的血肌酐水平,保护肾功能,这一作用与两种药物对全身性炎症反应的调节作用无关。
关键词: 颅内出血;丙泊酚;右美托咪定;肾功能;全身性炎症反应

Influence of two different sedative drugs on the renal function and systemic inflammatory response of patients with intracranial hemorrhage

Authors: 1ZUO Heping, 1ZHANG Hao, 1JIANG Cancan, 1LI Jingrong
1 Emergency Intensive Care Unit, Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China

CorrespondingAuthor: LI Jingrong Email: 412201761@qq.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.08.017

Foundation: This work was supported by the Anhui Medical University School Research Fund, China (2019xkj134).

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine sedation on renal function in patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and to explore the related mechanism. Methods: A total of 80 patients with ICH admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2020 to December 2021 were selected and randomly divided into a propofol sedation group (Group P) and a dexmedetomidine sedation group (Group D), each group with 40 patients. The patients in the Group P received a loading dose of 1 mg/kg propofol within 15 min, followed by sedation with a propofol maintenance dose of 1–3 mg/(kg·h); The patients in the Group D received a loading dose of 1.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine within 15 min, followed by sedation with a dexmedetomidine maintenance dose of 0.6 μg/(kg·h); The general information of all patients was recorded. Before sedative drugs administration (T0), 12 h after administration (T1) and 24 h after administration (T2), the levels of plasma interleukin-6, procalcitonin and blood creatinine were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: Compared with T0, the expression levels of interleukin-6, procalcitonin and blood creatinine in the 2 groups significantly increased at T1 and T2 time points. There was no difference in the expression levels of interleukin-6 and procalcitonin between the 2 groups at T1 and T2. At T1 and T2 time points, the expression level of blood creatinine in Group P was significantly higher than that in Group D. Conclusion: Compared with propofol sedation, dexmedetomidine sedation can significantly reduce the level of serum creatinine and protect renal function in patients with intracranial hemorrhage. This effect is not related to the regulatory effect of the two drugs on systemic inflammatory response.

Keywords: intracerebral hemorrhage; propofol; dexmedetomidine; renal function; systemic inflammatory response

文章选项