文章摘要

腰硬联合麻醉用于单孔腹腔镜妇科手术的麻醉效果及安全性

作者: 1周取升, 2唐飞, 1王美云
1 铜陵市妇幼保健院麻醉科,安徽 铜陵 244000
2 铜陵市妇幼保健院妇科,安徽 铜陵 244000
通讯: 周取升 Email: zqs13515623433@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.06.013

摘要

目的:回顾性分析腰硬联合麻醉(combined spinal and epidural analgesia,CSEA)用于单孔腹腔镜妇科手术的麻醉效果及安全性。方法:选取2019年12月至2021年8月在铜陵市妇幼保健院接受妇科单孔腹腔镜手术的60例患者作为研究对象。按照麻醉方法,应用CSEA者为观察组(n=30),采用硬膜外麻醉者为对照组(n=30)。结果:观察组的麻醉优良率为90.00%,显著高于对照组的73.33%(P=0.023);观察组的麻醉起效时间和住院时间均较对照组短(P<0.01),而镇痛持续时间较对照组长(P<0.01);两组患者进入手术室时(T0)、麻醉开始时(T1)和麻醉开始10 min(T2)时,血压或心率差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);然而,在麻醉开始20 min(T3)和30 min(T4)时,观察组的血压和心率变化较对照组更加平稳。2组患者不良事件总发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:CSEA应用于单孔腹腔镜妇科手术中,较硬膜外麻醉安全性更高,起效时间更快,并发症少,具有较高的临床应用价值。
关键词: 腰硬联合麻醉;单孔镜妇科手术;麻醉效果;安全性

Anesthesia effect and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in single-port laparoscopic gynecological surgery

Authors: 1ZHOU Qusheng, 2TANG Fei, 1WANG Meiyun
1 Department of Anesthesiology, Tongling Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Tongling Anhui 244000, China
2 Department of Gynecology, Tongling Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Tongling Anhui 244000, China

CorrespondingAuthor: ZHOU Qusheng Email: zqs13515623433@163.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.06.013

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively analyze the anesthesia effect and safety of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in single-port laparoscopic gynecological surgery. Methods: From December 2019 to August 2021, 60 patients who underwent gynecological single-port surgery in our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the different methods of anesthesia, they were divided into an observation group of 30 cases (using CSEA) and a control group of 30 cases (using epidural anesthesia). Results: The excellent and good rate of anesthesia in the observation group was 90.00%, which was significantly higher than 73.33% in the control group (P=0.023). the difference was statistically significant (P=0.023). There was no significant difference in blood pressure or heart rate between the two groups when they entered the operating room (T0), when anesthesia started (T1), and 10 min after anesthesia started (T2) (P>0.05). However, the changes in blood pressure and heart rate in the observation group were more stable than those in the control group at 20 min (T3) and 30 min (T4) of the onset of anesthesia. There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse events between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with epidural anesthesia, CSEA has higher safety, faster onset time, fewer complication and higher clinical application value in single-port laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Keywords: combined spinal-epidural anesthesia; single port laparoscopic gynecological surgery; anesthesia effect; safety

文章选项