文章摘要

胸神经II阻滞和胸椎旁神经阻滞对改良乳腺癌根治术的镇痛效果比较

作者: 1郑重, 1张立东, 1祁富伟, 1何静, 1杨广宇
1 太仓市第一人民医院麻醉科,江苏 太仓 215400
通讯: 郑重 Email: WF79787654@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.02.014

摘要

目的:比较胸神经II(pectoral nerves II,Pecs II)阻滞与胸椎旁神经(thoracic paravertebral nerve,TPVN)阻滞改良乳腺癌根治术围手术期的镇痛效果及对炎性细胞因子、术后早期恢复质量的影响。方法:选取2019年3月至2021年3月于江苏省太仓市第一人民医院择期行改良乳腺癌根治术的80例患者为研究对象,随机分为Pecs II组与TPVN组,每组40例,并以同期20例健康体检者作对照组。Pecs II组采用Pecs II阻滞,TPVN组采用TPVN阻滞。比较两组术后0.5、2、4、6、12、24、48 h时疼痛视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale,VAS)及镇痛持续时间、术后24 h内舒芬太尼用量,检测术前、术后1、3 d时血清白细胞介素-6(interleukin-6,IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor,TNF-α)水平,比较术后1、2、3 d时40项恢复质量评分量表(40-item Quality of Recovery Questionnaire,QoR-40)评分,观察术后不良反应。结果:与TPVN组相比,Pecs II组在术后2~24 h时的VAS评分均明显更低,镇痛持续时间更长,术后24 h内舒芬太尼用量更少(P<0.05)。Pecs II组在术后1、3 d时的血清IL-6、TNF-α水平均明显低于TPVN组(P<0.05)。Pecs II组QoR-40评分在术后1~3 d均明显高于TPVN组(P<0.05)。两组术后不良反应总发生率比较无明显差异(17.50% vs 25.00%,P>0.05)。结论:Pecs II阻滞相较于TPVN阻滞对改良乳腺癌根治术患者的术后镇痛效果更好,还可有效降低炎性细胞因子水平,提升术后早期恢复质量。
关键词: 胸神经II阻滞;胸椎旁神经阻滞;镇痛;炎性细胞因子;术后恢复

Comparison of analgesic effect of pectoral nerve II block and thoracic paravertebral nerve block in modified radical mastectomy

Authors: 1ZHENG Zhong, 1ZHANG Lidong, 1QI Fuwei, 1HE Jing, 1YANG Guangyu
1 Department of Anesthesiology, First People’s Hospital of Taicang City, Taicang Jiangsu 215400, China

CorrespondingAuthor: ZHENG Zhong Email: WF79787654@163.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2022.02.014

Abstract

Objective: To compare effects of pectoral nerves II (Pecs II) block and thoracic paravertebral nerve (TPVN) block on perioperative analgesia, inflammatory cytokines and quality of early postoperative recovery after modified radical mastectomy. Methods: A total of 80 patients scheduled for modified radical mastectomy in our hospital from March 2019 to March 2021 were randomly divided into a Pecs II group and a TPVN group, 40 cases in each group, meanwhile, 20 healthy people in the same period served as the control group. Pecs II block was used in the Pecs II group and TPVN block was used in the TPVN group. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 0.5, 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48 h after the operation, and duration of analgesia, sufentanil dosage within 24 h after the operation were compared between the 2 groups. The serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were detected before operation, 1 and 3 d after the operation, and the scores of 40-item Quality of Recovery Questionnaire (QoR-40) were compared at 1, 2 and 3 d after the operation and the adverse reactions were observed. Results: Compared with the TPVN group, the VAS score of the Pecs II group was significantly lower at 2–24 hours after the operation, the duration of analgesia was longer, and sufentanil dosage was less in 24 h after the operation (P<0.05). The levels of IL-6 and TNF-α of the Pecs II group at 1 and 3 d after the operation were significantly lower than those of the TPVN group (P<0.05). The QoR-40 score at 1–3 d in Pecs II group was significantly higher than that in the TPVN group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total incidence of adverse reactions between the 2 groups (17.50% vs 25.00%, P>0.05). Conclusion: Compared with TPVN block, Pecs II block has better postoperative analgesia effect in patients with modified radical mastectomy, and can effectively reduce the level of inflammatory factors and improve the quality of early postoperative recovery.
Keywords: pectoral nerve II block; thoracic paravertebral nerve block; analgesia; inflammatory cytokines; postoperative recovery

文章选项