高血糖状态合并急性缺血性脑梗死对阿替普酶溶栓早期疗效的影响
作者: |
1陈金金,
1赵宗友,
1杨晓莉,
1李磊
1 阜南县人民医院神经内科,安徽 阜阳 236300 |
通讯: |
陈金金
Email: tuk4513@163.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.08.007 |
摘要
目的:本研究旨在分析在急性缺血性脑卒中(acute ischemic stroke,AIS)患者中,高血糖对阿替普酶(rt-PA)静脉溶栓患者预后的影响,从而为临床治疗提供相关的依据。方法:回顾性收集安徽省阜南县人民医院2018年01月至2019年12月住院行rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗的256例AIS患者的信息资料。根据入院血糖将患者分为正常血糖组(血糖≤7.8mmol/L)和急性高血糖组(血糖>7.8mmol/L),根据HbA1c水平将患者分为正常HbA1c组(HbA1c≤6.5%)和慢性高血糖组(HbA1c>6.5%)。分析患者的年龄、性别、既往病史、生化指标、美国国立卫生院卒中量表(NIH Stroke Scale,NIHSS)评分、临床预后等指标。观察高血糖对rt-PA静脉溶栓治疗急性脑梗死早期疗效的影响。结果:入院急性高血糖、慢性高血糖以及既往糖尿病史均与溶栓后不良预后相关。入院时,相比于正常血糖患者,急性高血糖患者溶栓后即刻NIHSS评分(P=0.039)和24 h NIHSS评分(P=0.025)更低,而不良预后比率(P<0.05)更高。而慢性高血糖患者溶栓前后NIHSS评分无明显差异,但不良事件的发生率较高(P=0.043)。Logistic回归分析表明急性高血糖、慢性高血糖、糖尿病史与急性脑梗死患者静脉溶栓后临床不良预后独立相关。结论:对于rt-PA静脉溶栓的AIS患者,溶栓前血糖>7.8 mmol/L或HbA1c>6.5%以及有既往糖尿病史时,溶栓后不良事件的发生率均增加。虽然高血糖影响溶栓治疗的预后,但是总体上溶栓仍可改善高血糖伴AIS患者的神经功能。对于纠正急性期高血糖是否能改善AIS患者rt-PA溶栓的预后仍需要多中心大规模前瞻性随机对照试验来证实。
关键词:
急性脑梗死;高血糖;阿替普酶;不良预后
Early efficacy of hyperglycemia with acute ischemic cerebral infarction on thrombolysis with alteplase
CorrespondingAuthor: CHEN Jinjin Email: tuk4513@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.08.007
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of hyperglycemia on the prognosis of patients with alteplase (rt-PA) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, so as to provide relevant evidence for clinical treatment. Methods: The data of 256 patients with acute ischemic stroke who underwent rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis in Funan people’s Hospital from January 2018 to December 2019 were collected retrospectively. Patients were divided into normal glucose group (glucose ≤7.8 mmol/L) and acute hyperglycemia group (glucose >7.8 mmol/L) based on the admission blood glucose, and patients were divided into normal HbA1c group (HbA1c ≤6.5%) and chronic hyperglycemia group (HbA1c >6.5%) based on HbA1c level. The patients’ age, gender, past medical history, biochemical indexes, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, clinical prognosis and other indicators were analyzed. Results: Acute hyperglycemia, chronic hyperglycemia at admission, and previous history of diabetes were all associated with poor prognosis after thrombolysis. On admission, compared to patients with normal blood glucose, the NIHSS scores (P=0.039) and 24 h NIHSS scores (P=0.025) were lower, and the rates of poor prognosis (P<0.05) was higher in patients with acute hyperglycemia. There was no significant difference in NIHSS scores before and after thrombolysis in patients with chronic hyperglycemia, but the incidence of adverse events was higher (P=0.043). Logistic regression analysis showed that the history of acute hyperglycemia, chronic hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus were independently related to the poor clinical prognosis of patients with acute cerebral infarction after intravenous thrombolysis. Conclusion: For AIS patients with rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis, the incidence of adverse events after thrombolysis was increased in case of pre-thrombolysis blood glucose >7.8 mmol/L or HbA1c >6.5% and previous diabetes history. Although hyperglycemia affects the prognosis of thrombolytic therapy, thrombolysis can still improve the neurological function defect of patients with hyperglycemia and AIS in general. Whether correcting acute hyperglycemia improves the outcome of rt-PA thrombolytic therapy in AIS patients still needs to be confirmed by a large prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Keywords:
acute cerebral infarction; hyperglycemia; alteplase; poor prognosis