右美托咪定在超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞中的应用效果及其对肢体缺血再灌注损伤的影响
作者: |
1董志鹏,
2张鹤,
1汪洪,
1许日昇
1 芜湖市第五人民医院麻醉科,安徽 芜湖 241000 2 皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院麻醉科,安徽 芜湖 241000 |
通讯: |
董志鹏
Email: 309743673@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.04.008 |
摘要
目的:探讨右美托咪定在超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞(brachial plexus block,BPB)中的应用效果及其对肢体缺血再灌注损伤的影响。方法:选取芜湖市第五人民医院2017年8月至2020年8月106例行超声引导下BPB麻醉的尺桡骨骨折内固定手术患者,随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各53例,对照组给予罗哌卡因,观察组在对照组的基础上给予盐酸右美托咪定,比较两组不同时间点阻滞前5min(T0)、阻滞后10 min(T1)、15 min(T2)、30 min(T3)、60 min(T4)、90 min(T5)、手术结束即刻(T6)、术后4 h(T7)、术后8 h(T8)、术后24 h(T9)、术后48 h(T10)各项指标变化,感觉与运动神经阻滞起效及维持时间;T0,T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时间点心率(heart rate,HR)与平均动脉压(mean arterial pressure,MAP)水平;T0,T6,T7、T8、T9、T10时间点血清丙二醛(maleic dialdehyde,MDA)与超氧化物歧化酶(superoxide dismutase,SOD)水平;T0,T6,T7、T8、T9、T10时间点血清肿瘤坏死因子(TNF-α)与白细胞介素8(IL-8)水平;T7、T8、T9、T10时间点VAS疼痛与Ramsay镇静评分;不良反应发生率。结果:观察组感觉和运动阻滞起效时间短于对照组,阻滞维持时间长于对照组(P<0.05);观察组T1、T2、T3、T4、T5时间点HR和MAP水平低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组T7、T8、T9、T10时间点血清SOD水平高于对照组,MDA水平低于对照组,IL-8和TNF-α水平低于对照组(均P<0.05);观察组患者T7、T8、T9时间点VAS疼痛评分低于对照组,Ramsay镇静评分高于对照组(均P<0.05);两组T10时间点VAS疼痛评分与Ramsay镇静评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组恶心、呕吐、嗜睡发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组术中心动过缓发生率高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:右美托咪定可有效缩短超声引导下BPB麻醉尺桡骨骨折内固定手术患者感觉阻滞起效时间,延长维持时间,保持血流动力学稳定,减轻缺血再灌注损伤,但患者术中心动过缓发生率较高。
关键词:
臂丛神经阻滞;超声引导;右美托咪定;效果;缺血再灌注损伤
The efficacy of dexmedetomidine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block and its influences on limb ischemia-reperfusion injury
CorrespondingAuthor: DONG Zhipeng Email: 309743673@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.04.008
Abstract
Objective: To explore the efficacy of dexmedetomidine in ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (BPB) and its influences on limb ischemia-reperfusion injury. Methods: A total of 106 patients who underwent internal fixation for radius and ulna racture and ultrasound-guided BPB anesthesia in the hospital from August 2017 to August 2020 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 53 cases in each group. The control group was given ropivacaine, while the observation group was given dexmedetomidine hydrochloride on the basis of the control group. We compared changes of the two groups in each index at 5 min before block (T0), 10 min after block (T1), 15 min after block (T2), 30 min after block (T3), 60 min after block (T4) and 90 min after block (T5), immediately after surgery (T6), at 4 h after surgery (T7), 8 h after surgery (T8), 24 h after surgery (T9) and 48 h after surgery (T10) and the onset and maintenance time of sensory and motor nerve block in them. Besides, we also compared other changes between the two groups, including heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) at T0, T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, serum malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) at T0, T6, T7, T8, T9, and T10, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) at T0, T6, T7, T8, T9 and T10, scores of VAS pain and Ramsay sedation at T7, T8, T9 and T10, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions. Results: The onset time of sensory and motor nerve block in observation group was shorter than that in the control group, while its maintenance time was longer than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). At T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, the HR and MAP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). At T7, T8, T9 and T10, level of serum SOD in observation group was higher than that in the control group, the MDA lower than that in the control group, the levels of IL-8 and TNF-α lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). At T7, T8 and T9, patients’ scores of VAS pain in observation group were lower than those in the control group, while the scores of Ramsay sedation were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). At T10, there were no statistically significant differences in scores of VAS pain and Ramsay sedation between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistic significance about the differences in the incidence of nausea, vomiting or sleepiness between the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of intraoperative bradycardia in observation group was higher than that in the control group (13.21% vs 1.29%), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine can effectively shorten the onset time of sensory block in patients undergoing internal fixation for radius and ulna fracture under ultrasound-guided BPB anesthesia, prolong the maintainance time of sensory block, maintain hemodynamic stability, and alleviate ischemia-reperfusion injury, but it may increase the incidence of intraoperative bradycardia.
Keywords:
brachial plexus block; ultrasound guidance; dexmedetomidine; effect; ischemia reperfusion injury