基于动机行为转化的预见性护理对躁狂症患者的干预
作者: |
1孙凯丽,
2陆惠洁
1 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心精神科A3病房,上海 201108 2 上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心精神科L8病房,上海 201108 |
通讯: |
孙凯丽
Email: 8222618@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2020.11.030 |
摘要
目的:探究基于动机行为转化的预见性护理对躁狂症患者的干预效果,为患者的护理提供指导。方法:选取上海交通大学医学院附属精神卫生中心在2017年3月至2019年3月收治的100例躁狂症患者作为研究对象,按随机数表法,将其分为观察组与对照组(各50例)。对照组患者采取常规护理措施,观察组在对照组的基础上给予基于动机行为转化的预见性护理。采用大体评定量表(Global Assessment Scale,GAS)、躁狂症量表(Bech-Rafaelsdn Mania Rating Scale,BRMS)评价护理前后两组患者的护理效果;采用精神现状检查(Present State Examination,PSE)、社会功能缺陷筛查(Social Disability Screening Schedule,SDSS)评估患者劳动能力;比较两组患者治疗依从性、发作概率、住院时间、住院费用、服药时间以及护理满意度。结果:护理前,两组患者GAS,BRMS评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);护理后,观察组GAS评分明显高于对照组,BRMS评分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。护理后,观察组在丧失劳动能力患者比例明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组住院时间、服药时间、治疗依从性、住院费用、躁狂症发作率均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组护理满意度高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:基于动机行为转化的预见性护理模式护理效果显著,有利于提高躁狂症患者遵医行为依从性,缩短住院时间,促进患者恢复,预防患者攻击行为发生。
关键词:
躁狂症;动机行为转化;预见性护理;依从性;动机管理
Intervention of predictive nursing based on motivational behavior transformation of patients with mania
CorrespondingAuthor: SUN Kaili Email: 8222618@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2020.11.030
Abstract
Objective: To explore the intervention effect of predictive nursing based on the transformation of motivational behavior on patients with mania, and provide guidance for patient care. Methods: A total of 100 patients with mania treated in our hospital from March 2017 to March 2019 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random number table method, they were divided into observation group and control group (50 cases for each). Patients in the control group were given routine nursing measures, and the observation group was given predictive nursing based on motivational behavior conversion based on the nursing measures in the control group. Before and after nursing, the general assessment scale (GAS) and mania scale (BRMS) were used to evaluate the nursing effect of the two groups of patients, and the mental status check (PSE) and social function defect screening (SDSS) were used to evaluate the patient's labor capacity; patients in the group received treatment compliance, seizure probability, length of hospital stay, hospitalization cost, time of medication, and nursing satisfaction. Results: Before nursing, there was no significant difference in GAS and BRMS scores between the two groups of patients (P>0.05); after nursing, the GAS scores in the observation group were significantly higher than the control group, and the BRMS scores were lower than the control group (P<0.05). After nursing, the proportion of patients with disability in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The length of stay in the observation group, medication time, compliance with treatment, cost of hospitalization, and probability of manic in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The nursing satisfaction in the observation group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The predictive nursing mode based on the transformation of motivational behavior has significant nursing effect, which is beneficial to improve the compliance of mania patients in compliance with medical treatment, shorten the length of hospitalization, promote patient recovery, and prevent the occurrence of aggressive behavior in patients.
Keywords:
mania; motivational behavior transformation; predictive care; treatment compliance; motivation management