分泌型脑膜瘤5例临床病理分析
作者: |
1张立英,
1祁晓莉,
2许春伟
1 首都医科大学大兴教学医院病理科,北京 102600 2 福建省肿瘤医院病理科,福州 350014 |
通讯: |
祁晓莉
Email: qxl1965@163.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.05.038 |
摘要
探讨分泌型脑膜瘤(secretory meningioma,SM)的临床病理学特点、免疫表型、鉴别诊断、治疗及预后。回顾性分析5例SM患者的临床病理资料,观察其病理形态学特征、组织化学PAS染色及免疫表型特点。5例患者中,男性3例,女性2例,年龄为30~74(平均51.4)岁。发生在小脑蚓部1例,右额颞部1例,前颅窝底部、右大脑镰部多发占位1例,左、右大脑镰旁各1例。光镜下可见肿瘤细胞圆形或卵圆形,漩涡状排列,细胞大小比较一致,胞质丰富淡染,界限不清;肿瘤细胞核较大,圆形或卵圆形,核膜清晰,部分细胞核染色质边集,核分裂象少见;部分区域肿瘤细胞胞浆内可见大小不等、单个或成簇分布的嗜酸性包涵体,包涵体周围有明显空晕。嗜酸性包涵体PAS染色阳性,免疫组化染色结果显示全部病例肿瘤细胞EMA、Vimentin、PR阳性、嗜酸性包涵体及少量周围细胞CK-pan(AE1/AE3)、CEA呈阳性,S-100、CD34、GFAP、Oligo-2均阴性,Ki-67增殖指数1%~3%。5例病理诊断均为SM,WHO Ⅰ级。术后随访20~120(平均67.8)个月,均未见复发或转移。SM十分少见,具有独特的病理形态学特征及免疫表型,临床分期比较低,预后较好。
关键词:
脑膜瘤;分泌型;嗜酸性包涵体;病理诊断
Clinicopathological analysis of 5 cases of secretory meningioma
CorrespondingAuthor: QI Xiaoli Email: qxl1965@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.05.038
Abstract
To investigate the clinicopathological features, immunophenotype, differential diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of secretory meningioma (SM). The clinical and pathological data of 5 patients with SM were retrospectively analyzed, and their pathomorphological features, PAS histochemical staining and immunophenotypic features were observed. Among the 5 patients, 3 were male and 2 were female, aged from 30 to 74 (51.4 on average) years old. There was 1 case that occurred in cerebellar vermis, 1 case in the right frontotemporal region, 1 case in multiple lesions at the bottom of anterior cranial fossa and in the right cerebral falx, and 1 case in the left and right cerebral falx respectively. Under the light microscope, the tumor cells were round or oval, arranged in a spiral shape, with relatively consistent cell sizes, rich and lightly stained cytoplasm, and unclear boundaries; the tumor cell nucleus was large, round or oval, with clear nuclear membrane, some nuclear chromatin on the edge and rare mitotic figures. In some areas, eosinophilic inclusions of varying sizes, single or cluster distributed could be seen in the cytoplasm of tumor cells, and there was a clear halo around the eosinophilic inclusions. The eosinophilic inclusions were positive for PAS staining. Immunohistochemical staining showed that all cases were positive of EMA, Vimentin, and PR in the tumor cells; CK-pan (AE1/AE3) and CEA showed positivity in eosinophilic inclusions and some tumor cells around them; S-100, CD34, GFAP, Oligo-2 were all negative and Ki-67 proliferation index was about 1%–3%. The pathological diagnosis of all these 5 cases was SM, grade I, based on the 2016 World Health Organization criteria of Central Nervous System Tumor. After follow-up for 20 to 120 months (67.8 months on average), there was no recurrence or metastasis. SM is very rare, with unique pathological morphological features and immunophenotype, low clinical stage, and good prognosis.
Keywords:
meningioma; secretory type; eosinophilic inclusions; pathological diagnosis