老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症行改良经椎间孔脊柱内镜系统治疗的安全性及有效性
作者: |
1张红,
1王平,
1丁文羽,
1武春雷,
1王昊,
1陈宏豫
1 解放军第二五四医院骨科,天津 300142 |
通讯: |
王平
Email: 605040116@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.10.016 |
基金: | 国家重大科技基金项目 (2008ZX10002-025)。 |
摘要
目的:分析改良经椎间孔脊柱内镜系统(transforaminal endoscopic system,TESSYS)在治疗老年 退变性腰椎管狭窄症中的疗效和安全性。方法:将2016年9月至2017年12月于解放军第二五四 医院就诊的52例老年退变性腰椎管狭窄患者随机分为实验组与对照组(每组各26例),对照组 采用常规TESSYS术式,实验组患者使用改良TESSYS术式。比较两组患者术后1个月、3个月和 6个月的疗效(改良Macnab疗效分级)、手术指标(手术时间、术中出血量和住院时间)、Oswestry 功能障碍指数(Oswestry Disability Index,ODI)评分和疼痛视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)评分以及并发症发生率。结果:实验组与对照组分别有2 例及1例患者因病情由椎间孔 镜下椎管减压术转为常规切开椎管减压术;两组患者术后1个月和3个月的疗效间无明显差异 (Z分别为1.255,0.946;P分别为0.209,0.334),两组6个月的疗效均优于术后第1个月(Z分别为 2.106, 2.096;P分别为0.035,0.036);与对照组相比,实验组患者术后各时间的疗效更好(Z 分别为2.515,2.052,2.519;P分别为0.012,0.039,0.012)。实验组患者术中出血量和术后住 院时间明显低于对照组(t分别为−4.998,−2.299;P<0.001,P=0.026),两组手术时间无统计学 差异( t=1.609,P=0.114)。两组术前ODI评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组术后的 ODI评分明显低于术前(P<0.05);其中,实验组患者术后的ODI评分均明显低于对照组(t分别为 −2.129,−2.831,−3.245;P分别为0.039,0.006,0.002)。两组术前VAS评分比较,差异无统 计学意义(t=−0.176,P=0.861),术后VAS评分较术前显著降低(P<0.05),与对照组相比,实验 组患者术后VAS评分更低(t分别为−2.035,−3.289,−4.375;P分别为0.047,0.002,<0.001)。 两组均未发生死亡病例,对照组和实验组的并发症发生率间无统计学差异(8.33% vs 16.00%, χ2=0.146,P=0.702)。结论:改良TESSYS在治疗老年退变性腰椎管狭窄症中的近期和远期疗效 均优于常规术式,能够有效减少术中出血,降低患者疼痛程度,显著改善功能状态,安全性与 常规术式相似。
关键词:
椎管狭窄;退变性变;改良经椎间孔脊柱内镜系统;疗效;安全性
Safety and effectiveness of modified transforaminal endoscopic system in treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly
CorrespondingAuthor: WANG Ping Email: 605040116@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.10.016
Foundation: This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project Foundation, China (2008ZX10002-025).
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of modified transforaminal endoscopic system (TESSYS) in the treatment of aged degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: Fifty-two elderly patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis who came to our hospital from September 2016 to December 2017 were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group (26 cases for each). The control group was treated with conventional TESSYS, and the experimental group patients use the modified TESSYS procedure. Patients in the two groups were compared 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery (modified Macnab efficacy scale), surgical indicators (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital stay), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores and incidence of complications. Results: Two patients in the experimental group and one patient in the control group were converted from intervertebral canal decompression under foraminoscopy to conventional spinal canal decompression. There was no significant difference in efficacy between the two groups at 1 month and 3 months (Z=1.255, 0.946; P=0.209, 0.334). The efficacy of the two groups 6 months after the operation was better than those of the first month (Z=2.106, 2.096; P=0.035, 0.036). Compared with the control group, the efficacy of the experimental group was better at each time after operation (Z=2.515, 2.052, 2.519; P=0.012, 0.039, 0.012). The intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t=−4.998, −2.299; P<0.001, P=0.026). There was no statistical difference in the operation time between the two groups (t=1.609, P=0.114). There was no significant difference in preoperative ODI scores between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative ODI scores in the two groups were significantly lower than before surgery (P<0.05). Among them, ODI scores in the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group in the postoperative period (t=−2.129, −2.831, −3.245; P=0.039, 0.006, 0.002). There was no significant difference in preoperative VAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05), the postoperative VAS scores were significantly lower than before surgery (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the VAS of the experimental group was lower than those of control group (t=−2.035, −3.289, −4.375; P=0.047, 0.002, <0.001). No deaths occurred in both groups. There was no statistical difference between the control group and the experimental group (8.33% vs 16.00%, χ2=0.146, P=0.702). Conclusion: The modified transforaminal endoscopic system is superior to conventional ones in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. It can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss, reduce pain, and significantly improve functional status, the safety is similar to conventional surgery.
Keywords:
spinal stenosis; degenerative change; modified transforaminal spinal endoscopic system; efficacy; safety