文章摘要

胸腔镜下保留自主呼吸与全身麻醉单肺通气肺大泡切除术的疗效比较

作者: 1宋直雷, 1宋俊杰, 1洪道先, 1陈勇, 1何东海, 1张晗
1 河南大学第一附属医院麻醉科,河南 开封 475001
通讯: 宋直雷 Email: 1816676604@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.05.020
基金: 河南大学校内科研立项 (2013YBZR027)。

摘要

目的:探讨对比胸腔镜下保留自主呼吸与全身麻醉单肺通气肺大泡切除术术中及术后对循环和呼吸的影响。方法:选取2016年1月至2017年12月符合条件的60例肺大泡患者,均分为两组。对照组接受全身麻醉单肺通气肺大泡切除术,观察组接受保留自主呼吸肺大泡切除术。记录并比较两组手术时间、术后复苏时间、住院时间,不同时间段的动脉血二氧化碳分压(partial pressure of carbon dioxide,PaCO2)、动脉血氧分压(partial arterial oxygen pressure,PaO2),每搏量(stroke volume, SV)、心输出量(cardiac output,CO)、有创平均动脉压(Invasive mean arterial pressure,MAP)、心率(heart rate,HR)以及并发症发生情况。结果:观察组手术时间长于对照组,术后复苏时间及住院时间均短于观察组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术开始前两组各项心肺指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术开始15,30 min后及手术结束30 min后SV,CO,PaCO2,PaO2,MAP, HR指标观察组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:相比于全身麻醉单肺通气,保留自主呼吸方案能有效避免气管插管造成的呼吸道机械性损伤及异物造成的呼吸道感染,其对每搏量、心输出量、心率、动脉压等心肺功能影响较少,有利于动脉血PaCO2和PaO2保持在正常水平。
关键词: 肺大泡切除术;胸腔镜;全身麻醉单肺通气;保留自主呼吸

Comparison of clinical effect of thoracoscopic lung bullous resection of spontaneous breathing and general anesthesia with single lung ventilation

Authors: 1SONG Zhilei, 1SONG Junjie, 1HONG Daoxian, 1CHEN Yong, 1HE Donghai, 1ZHANG Han
1 Department of Anesthesiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University, Kaifeng Henan 475001, China

CorrespondingAuthor: SONG Zhilei Email: 1816676604@qq.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.05.020

Foundation: This work was supported by Henan University Scientific Research Project, China (2013YBZR027).

Abstract

Objective: To investigate and compared the effect of thoracoscopic lung bullous resection of spontaneous breathing and general anesthesia with single lung ventilation and incidence of complications during surgery and after surgery. Methods: Sixty patients with pulmonary bullae from January 2016 to June 2017 were selected to be divided into two groups. The control group received with general anesthesia pneumoconiectomy for lung bullae resection, and the trial group accepted to retain spontaneous breathing for lung bullae resection. Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO), invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), operation time, hospitalization time, complications were recorded and compared in the two groups. Results: The operation time of the trial group was longer than that of the control group, while the postoperative resuscitation time and hospital stay were shorter than those in the control group, the differences were all statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no differences in cardiopulmonary parameters between the two groups before the surgery. The scores of SV, CO, PaCO2, PaO2, MAP and HR in the trial group were better than those in the control group at 15 min, 30 min after the surgery began and 30 min after the end of surgery. Conclusion: Compared to the general anesthesia single lung ventilation, retaining spontaneous breathing can effectively avoid respiratory injury caused by tracheal intubation and respiratory tract infection caused by foreign body. It has less impact on stroke volume, cardiac output, heart rate, arterial pressure and other cardiopulmonary functions. It is conducive to maintain partial pressure of arterial blood carbon dioxide and partial pressure of arterial oxygen on normal level.
Keywords: pulmonary bullae resection; thoracoscopy; general anesthesia single lung ventilation; keep independent breathing

文章选项