乳腺浸润性导管癌剪切波弹性成像:定量弹性值 与蛋白分子水平表达的相关性
作者: |
1杨艳艳,
1李晶
1 中国医科大学附属盛京医院超声科,沈阳 110004 |
通讯: |
李晶
Email: lijing@sj-hospital.org |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.10.009 |
摘要
目的:探讨乳腺浸润性导管癌(invasive ductal carc inoma,I DC)剪切波弹性成像(shear-wave elastography,SWE)参数与蛋白分子表达及分子分型的相关性。方法:前瞻性纳入因乳腺实性肿块接受手术或者穿刺活检的女性患者182例(共184个肿块)进行SWE,横、纵切面各进行2次,采用感兴趣区(region of interest,ROI)=2 mm测量SWE弹性定量参数,取4个切面的均值,检测弹性最大值(Emax)、弹性平均值(Emean)、弹性比(Eratio)。分析病理结果,蛋白分子(ER,PR,HER2,Ki-67, p53)表达情况,基于蛋白分子表达将肿块分为4个分子分型:Luminal A型、Luminal B型、HER2过表达型、Basal-like型。利用t检验、单因素方差分析和多元线性回归分析评估各弹性定量参数与蛋白分子表达及分子分型之间的关系。结果:在单变量分析中,肿块大小、组织分级和Ki-67表达与Emax平方根和Emean平方根具有显著相关性(均P<0.05)。不同大小肿块间Eratio对数(P<0.001)差异具有统计学意义。分子分型与弹性值无明显联系。在多因素分析中,肿瘤大小与各弹性值独立相关。结论:肿块越大,弹性值越高,肿块越硬。目前尚不能证明蛋白分子表达和分子分型与肿块硬度之间具有相关性。
关键词:
浸润性导管癌;剪切波弹性成像;蛋白分子表达
Shear-wave elastography of breast invasive ductal carcinoma: correlation between quantitative elasticity value and protein expression
CorrespondingAuthor: LI Jing Email: lijing@sj-hospital.org
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.10.009
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the correlation of shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters with protein expression and molecular subtype in breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Methods: A total of 184 invasive ductal cancers in 182 women underwent SWE before surgery or biopsy. Two elastographic images from two orthogonal planes were obtained for each lesion. SWE elastic quantitative parameters, including the maximum stiffness (Emax), mean stiffness (Emean), ratio of stiffness of the mass to stiffness of the surrounding fatty tissue (Eratio) were measured with region of interest (ROI) =2 mm. The pathologic results and protein molecules (ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, p53) expression were anayled and detected, respectively. Based on the protein molecules expression, the tumors were divided into four subtypes: Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Basal-like. We used Student’ t-test or one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression to evaluate the correlation of between elastic quantitative parameters with protein molecular expression and molecular subtypes. Results: At univariate analysis, lesion size, histologic grade and Ki-67 expression were significantly associated with the maximum stiffness square root and mean stiffness square root (all P<0.01). Only the difference in logarithm of Eratio between tumors of different sizes was statistically significant (P<0.001). There was no significant relationship between molecular subtypes and quantitative elasticity values. By multivariate analysis, only lesion size was independent statistically associated with quantitative elasticity values. Conclusion: The bigger the lesion, the higher the elasticity values, the harder the lesion. We were unable to demonstrate a correlation between protein molecule expression and molecular subtypes and tumor hardness.
Keywords:
invasive ductal carcinoma; shear-wave elastography; protein molecular expression