文章摘要

乙型肝炎血清标志物模式及前S1抗原与乙型肝炎病毒DNA定量检测的关系

作者: 1王蕾, 1,2李世宝, 2金玉
1 徐州医科大学医学技术学院,江苏 徐州 221004
2 徐州医科大学附属医院检验科,江苏 徐州 221002
通讯: 金玉 Email: xzjsjyxz@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.10.006
基金: 江苏省青年医学重点人才培养项目 (QNRC2016781)。

摘要

目的:探讨乙型肝炎病毒血清标志物(hepatitis B v ir us serum markers,HBV-M)及前S1抗原(pre-S1Ag)与HBV-DNA含量的相关性及其临床意义。方法:收集2016年12月至2018年1月于徐州医科大学附属医院就诊的556例乙型病毒肝炎患者的外周血。分别采用电化学发光法、磁微粒化学发光技术检测乙型肝炎病毒血清标志物和乙型肝炎病毒前S1抗原(HBV pre-S1Ag);运用荧光定量聚合酶链反应(fluorescence quantitative PCR,qRT-PCR)测定血清HBV-DNA含量。结果:HBV不同血清模式下,HBV-DNA与Pre-S1Ag检测结果比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。乙型肝炎表面抗原(HBsAg)、乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)、乙型肝炎核心抗体(抗-HBc)阳性组(1,3,5模式)HBV-DNA检出率92.70%,pre-S1Ag检出率97.08%;HBsAg,乙型肝炎e抗体(HBeAb),抗-HBc阳性组(1,4, 5模式)HBV-DNA检出率54.62%,pre-S1Ag检出率86.92%;HBsAg,HBeAg,HBeAb,抗-HBc阳性组(1,3,4,5模式)HBV-DNA检出率95.83%,pre- S1Ag检出率100%;HBsAg,乙型肝炎表面抗体(HBsAb),HBeAb,抗-HBc阳性组(1,2,4,5模式)HBV-DNA检出率41.67%,pre-S1Ag检出率79.17%。HBsAb,HBeAb,抗-HBc阳性组(2,4,5模式)均未检出HBV-DNA与pre-S1Ag。HBeAg阳性患者外周血中HBV-DNA和HBV pre-S1Ag检出率依次为92.74%和94.97%。结论:HBV血清标志物检测可辅助诊断是否感染HBV。Pre-S1Ag可作为一个较好的指标来判断乙型肝炎病毒的感染、复制以及活动性状况,但尚不能取代HBV-DNA定量。HBV-DNA定量与HBV血清标志物的联合应用可提高乙型肝炎的诊断效率。
关键词: 乙型肝炎病毒;乙型肝炎前S1抗原;乙型肝炎病毒DNA;血清标志物

Relationship between hepatitis B serum markers and pre-S1 antigen with hepatitis B virus DNA quantitative detection

Authors: 1WANG Lei, 1,2LI Shibao, 2JIN Yu
1 School of Medical Technology, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221004
2 Department of Clinical Laboratory, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou Jiangsu 221002, China

CorrespondingAuthor: JIN Yu Email: xzjsjyxz@163.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.10.006

Foundation: This work was supported by the Young Medical Key Talents Training Project from Jiangsu Province, China (QNRC2016781).

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relationship between hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV-DNA) and HBV serum markers (HBV-M) as well as HBV pre-S1Ag. Methods: In all, 556 peripheral blood samples were prospectively collected from patients who are suffering from HBV at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between December 2016 and January 2018. HBV-M and pre-S1Ag were respectively detected with electrochemiluminescence and magnetic particles chemiluminescence method. The content of HBV-DNA was analyzed by fluorescence quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR). Results: The positive rates between HBV pre-S1Ag and HBV-DNA were significantly different among the different HBV-M mode group (P<0.05). In HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBc positive group (1, 3, 5 modes), the positive rate of HBV-DNA and HBV pre-S1Ag were 92.70% and 97.08% respectively. These quantitative indicators respectively reached 54.62% and 86.92% in HBsAg, HBeAb, anti-HBc positive group (1, 4, 5 modes). In the model of HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (+)/HBeAb (+)/anti-HBc (+) group, the positive rate of HBV-DNA and HBV pre-S1Ag were 95.83% and 100% respectively. In the model of HBsAg (+)/HBsAb/HBeAb (+)/anti-HBc (+), HBV-DNA detection rate was 41.67% and pre-S1Ag account for 79.17%. However, HBV-DNA and HBV pre-S1Ag were not detected in HBsAb, HBeAb, anti-HBc positive group (2, 4, 5 modes). Overall, the positive rate of HBV-DNA and HBV pre-S1Ag were respectively 92.74% and 94.97% in patients with HBeAg (+). Conclusion: The detection of HBV serum marker can help to diagnose HBV infection. HBV pre-S1Ag is a better index, which can determine the infection, reproduction and activity of HBV, however, it still can’t substitute HBV-DNA. HBV pre-S1Ag, a good parameter in judgment the infection, replication and activity of HBV, can’t replace the HBV-DNA quantification. The combination of the HBV-DNA quantification and the HBV serum markers detection can improve the diagnostic efficiency of hepatitis B.
Keywords: hepatitis B virus; hepatitis B virus pre-S1Ag; hepatitis B virus DNA; serum markers

文章选项