在社区中应用分筋理筋手法治疗落枕的临床疗效分析
作者: |
1廖庆华,
1覃朝锋,
1王逸柳
1 深圳市宝安区沙井人民医院健康服务中心,广东 深圳 518104 |
通讯: |
廖庆华
Email: la20151973g518@163.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.09.020 |
基金: | 深圳市宝安区社会公益项目, 2015210 |
摘要
目的:探讨分筋理筋膜手法治疗落枕的临床效果,分析分筋理筋手法在社区的应用价值和优势,从而更好为社区居民服务,更好地发掘利用和推广分筋理筋技术。方法:选取2014年1月至2015年1月,新二和一社区健康服务中心诊治的120例落枕患者为研究对象,按照随机数表法将其分为观察组与对照组,其中对照组采用拔罐治疗,观察组采用分筋理筋手法治疗,评估两组患者的治疗效果以及治疗1次和3次后的VAS疼痛评分、VAS强直评分。结果:采用分筋理筋手法治疗的观察组其总有效率为98.3%,明显高于采用拔罐治疗的对照组88.3%,差异显著有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1次后,观察组与对照组的VAS疼痛评分分别为(2.78±0.89)、(4.41±1.67)分,观察组的VAS疼痛评分显著低于对照组,二者比较有统计学差异(P<0.05);治疗3次后,观察组的VAS疼痛评分仍低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗1次及治疗3次后,观察组的VAS强直评分均显著低于对照组,二者比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:采用分筋理筋手法治疗落枕具有较佳的疗效,方法简便,医疗风险较低,适宜在社区卫生中心推广应用。
关键词:
分筋理筋技术
落枕
社区
Tendons manipulation in treatment of essential hypertension in community application
CorrespondingAuthor: LIAO Qinghua Email: la20151973g518@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2016.09.020
Abstract
Objective: To probe the clinical effect of reinforced tendon for stiff neck, analyse the value reinforced tendon in the application of the community and, so as to better service for the community residents and explore promotion reinforced tendon. Methods: 120 cases from January 2014 to January 2015 from the new Second and First community health service center were selected as the research object, according to the random number table method, the patients were divided into observation group and control group. The control group were treated by cupping therapy, the observation group were treated with reinforced tendon, assessed the therapeutic effect and treatment after the first time and 3 times with the VAS. pain score, a VAS rigidity score. Results: The total effective rate of the observation group was 98.3%, it is significantly higher than the cupping therapy of control group (88.3%), their difference had statistical significance (P<0.05). After 1 time of treatment, VAS pain score of observed group and control group were (2.78+0.89) and (4.41+1.67) respectively, observation group VAS pain score was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05); after 3 times of treatment, VAS pain rating points of the observation group was still lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). For 1 and 3 times after treatment, the observation group’ VAS ankylosis scores were significantly lower than control group, there was significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion: The reinforced tendon has a good effect for the stiff neck, and it is a simple method. It can make medical risk decline and it is suitable for popularization and application in the community health center.