连续性血液净化治疗脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者预后的危险因素
作者: |
1徐广民,
1吴化奎,
1曹子君,
1金磊
1 淮南市第一人民医院重症医学科,安徽 淮南 232000 |
通讯: |
徐广民
Email: 250876278@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.12.020 |
摘要
目的:探讨连续性血液净化(continuous blood purification,CBP)治疗脓毒症合并急性肾损伤(acute kidney injury,AKI)患者预后的危险因素。方法:回顾性分析80例接受CBP治疗的脓毒症合并AKI患者的临床资料,记录患者28 d转归情况,将死亡的29例患者纳入预后不良组,将存活的51例患者纳入预后良好组。收集并比较两组患者的基线临床资料,采用多因素logistic回归分析影响预后的危险因素。结果:单因素分析显示:两组患者在年龄、合并糖尿病、AKI分期、C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平、序贯器官衰竭估计(sequential organ failure assessment,SOFA)评分、急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统II(Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II,APACHE II)评分、机械通气、感染性休克、重症监护病房(intensive care unit,ICU)住院时间等方面比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);logistic回归分析结果显示:AKI分期III期、感染性休克、APACHE II评分≥20是CBP治疗脓毒症合并AKI患者预后不良的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。结论:AKI分期及APACHE II评分高、感染性休克是CBP治疗脓毒症合并AKI患者预后不良的独立危险因素。
关键词:
脓毒症;急性肾损伤;连续性血液净化;全身炎症反应综合征;危险因素
Risk factors for the prognosis of patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury treated by continuous blood purification
CorrespondingAuthor: XU Guangmin Email: 250876278@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2021.12.020
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the risk factors for the prognosis of patients with sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI) treated by continuous blood purification (CBP). Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with sepsis and AKI treated with CBP were retrospectively analyzed. The prognosis of the patients 28 d after the treatment was recorded. Twenty-nine patients who died were included into a poor prognosis group, and 51 patients who survived were included into a good prognosis group. The baseline clinical data of the two groups were collected and compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors affecting the prognosis. Results: Univariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age, diabetes mellitus, AKI stage, C-reactive protein (CRP), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, mechanical ventilation, septic shock, intensive care unit (ICU) stay between the two groups (P<0.05); logistic regression analysis showed that AKI stage III, septic shock and APACHE II score ≥20 were independent risk factors for poor prognosis of patients with sepsis and AKI treated with CBP (P<0.05). Conclusion: AKI stage, high APACHE II score, and septic shock are independent risk factors for poor prognosis of sepsis patients with AKI treated with CBP.
Keywords:
sepsis; acute kidney injury; continuous blood purification; systemic inflammatory response syndrome; risk factors