单中心不同前列腺特异性抗原区间经会阴与经直肠前列腺穿刺的对比分析
作者: |
1,2夏开国,
2陈凤华,
2沈德贇,
2李斌,
2葛庆宇,
2宣强,
2陶陶
1 皖南医学院研究生学院,安徽 芜湖 241002 2 中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)泌尿外科,合肥 230001 |
通讯: |
陶陶
Email: taotao860721@126.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.08.013 |
基金: | 国家自然科学基金(81702540);安徽省自然科学基金(1708085QH202)。 |
摘要
目的:比较双平面超声引导下不同前列腺特异性抗原(prostate-specific antigen,PSA)区间经会阴和经直肠前列腺穿刺活检的阳性率和并发症。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年12月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)行双平面超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的629例患者临床资料,其中经会阴组282例,经直肠组347例,将患者的PSA分为 ≤ 4 ng/mL,4 ng/mL < PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL,10 ng/mL < PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL,20 ng/mL < PSA < 100 ng/mL和 ≥ 100 ng/mL 5个区间,分别统计分析这5个区间患者的基本资料、穿刺阳性率和并发症。结果:两组阳性率会阴组为52.13%,直肠组为40.63%,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);在PSA的5个区间会阴组阳性率均高于直肠组,但仅20~100 ng/mL区间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。会阴组总体并发症发生率低于直肠组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);其中肉眼血尿、尿路感染、发热和迷走神经兴奋发生率会阴组显著低于直肠组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);尿潴留发生率2组差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。直肠出血为直肠组特有并发症,会阴肿痛为会阴组特有并发症。结论:经会阴穿刺阳性率高于经直肠,并发症发生率低于经直肠。
关键词:
经会阴;经直肠;前列腺穿刺;阳性率;并发症
Comparative analysis of transperineal and transrectal prostate puncture in different prostate-specific antigen intervals in a single center
CorrespondingAuthor: TAO Tao Email: taotao860721@126.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.08.013
Foundation: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (81702540) and the Anhui Natural Science Foundation (1708085QH202), China.
Abstract
Objective: To compare of positive results and puncture complication rate of transperineal and transrectal prostate puncture in different prostate-specific antigen (PSA) intervals by biplane B-ultrasound guided. Methods: Retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 629 patients who underwent double-plane B-ultrasound guided prostate puncture from January 2017 to December 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, including 282 patients in the perineal group and 347 patients in the rectal group. The PSA value of the patients was divided into ≤ 4 ng/mL, 4 ng/mL < PSA ≤ 10 ng/mL, 10 ng/mL < PSA ≤ 20 ng/mL, 20 ng/mL < PSA < 100 ng/mL and ≥100 ng/mL 5 intervals, respectively and total puncture positive rate of the 5 intervals were counted. Basic data such as age, prostate volume, body mass index (BMI), Gleason score, and complications were counted, and differences between the two groups were compared. Results: The overall positive rate of the perineal group was 52.13% and of the rectal group was 40.63%, they had significant difference (P < 0.05). In the 5 PSA intervals, there were no significant difference about positive rates of the two groups (P > 0.05). But in the PSA 20~100 ng/mL interval, the positive rates have significant differences (P < 0.05). About the overall complications, the rectal group was higher than the perineal group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Among them, gross hematuria, urinary tract infection, fever, and vasovagal reaction were significantly higher in the rectal group (P < 0.05), except acute urinary retention (P > 0.05). Rectal hemorrhage was a special complication of the rectal group, and the perineal swelling and pain were specific complications of the perineal group. Conclusion: The positive rate of prostate puncture in the perineal group is significantly higher than in the rectal group. The incidence of complications in the perineal group is significantly lower than in the rectal group.
Keywords:
transrectal; transperineal; prostate puncture; positive rate; complication