系统评价PDCA 护理管理在白血病行PICC患者中的应用效果
作者: |
1朱群卉,
1张青,
1张研,
1杨文平,
1胡笛,
1杜运,
1廖晓琴,
1李艳苹,
1谭艳丽,
1宋正芳,
1曾艳
1 恩施土家族苗族自治州中心医院血液内科,湖北 恩施 445000 |
通讯: |
曾艳
Email: 197117156@qq.com |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.01.023 |
摘要
目的:系统评价“策划-实施-检查-改进”(plan-do-check action,PDCA)护理管理对白血病行经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管术(peripherally inserted central catheter,PICC)患者的导管留置时间及并发症的影响。方法:计算机检索CBM,CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,PubMed,CENTRAL,Embase, CINAHL数据库。收集有关PDCA护理管理对白血病行PICC患者疗效的随机对照试验,2名研究者独立按照纳入排除标准筛选文献,纳入文献的质量采用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险评估工具进行评估,数据合并采用RevMan 5.3软件。结果:共纳入18项研究,1 285例患者。PDCA护理管理与常规护理相比,在PICC导管留置时间(MD=22.30,95% CI:15.40~29.20,P<0.05)、穿刺点感染(OR=0.42,95% CI:0.25~0.71,P<0.05)、静脉炎(OR=0.28,95% CI:0.17~0.46,P<0.05)、血管内导管相关感染(OR=0.32,95% CI:0.17~0.59,P<0.05)、导管堵塞(OR=0.23,95% CI: 0.13~0.39,P<0.05)、意外脱管(OR=0.22,95% CI:0.11~0.46,P<0.05)等方面的差异有统计学意义。结论:PDCA护理管理与常规护理相比,能增加白血病行PICC患者的导管留置时间,减少穿刺点感染、静脉炎、血管内导管相关感染、导管堵塞、意外脱管等并发症的发生。
关键词:
PDCA;白血病;经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管;系统评价
Systematic evaluation of the effect of PDCA nursing management on leukemia patients with PICC
CorrespondingAuthor: ZENG Yan Email: 197117156@qq.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.01.023
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of “Plan-Do-Check Action” (PDCA) nursing management on patients with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) catheterization in leukemia. Methods: Data of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PDCA nursing management for leukemia patient with PICC catheterization were collected by searching the eight electronic databases: CBM, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, CINAHL. Two reviewers independently screened literatures according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies by the Cochrane “Risk of Bias Tool”. Data synthesis was conducted by RevMan 5.3 software. Results: A total of 18 RCTs involving 1 285 patients were included. The results of systematic review showed that compared with the conventional nursing for leukemia patient with PICC catheterization, PDCA nursing management has statistical significance on PICC catheter retention time (MD=22.30, 95% CI: 15.40–29.20, P<0.05), puncture point infection (OR=0.42, 95% CI: 0.25–0.71, P<0.05), phlebitis (OR=0.28, 95% CI: 0.17–0.46, P<0.05), intravascular catheter related infection (OR=0.32, 95% CI: 0.17–0.59, P<0.05), catheter blockage (OR=0.23, 95% CI: 0.13–0.39, P<0.05), and accidental dehydration (OR=0.22, 95% CI: 0.11–0.46, P<0.05). Conclusion: Compared with conventional nursing, PDCA nursing management can increase the catheter retention time of patients with leukemia PICC catheterization, reduce the incidence of infection of puncture point, phlebitis, intravascular catheter related infection, catheter blockage, accidental tube removal and other complications.
Keywords:
PDCA; leukemia; peripherally inserted central catheter; systematic review