文章摘要

急性胰腺炎孤立性胰周组织坏死与合并胰腺实质坏死的临床与预后特征

作者: 1黄海进, 2焦峰, 2仲艳阳
1 淮安市洪泽区人民医院普通外科,江苏 淮安 223100
2 解放军第八二医院普通外科,江苏 淮安 223001
通讯: 焦峰 Email: hapwk@sina.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.08.014
基金: 国家自然科学基金青年项目(81600689)。

摘要

目的:探讨急性胰腺炎(acute pancreatitis,AP)孤立性胰周组织坏死(extrapancreatic necrosis,EPN)与合并胰腺实质坏死(pancreatic parenchymal necrosis,PPN)的临床与预后特征。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年4月收治的118例急性坏死性胰腺炎,根据CT影像学评估,26例属于孤立性EPN(孤立性EPN组),92例属于EPN合并PPN(EPN+PPN组),比较两组人口学特征、临床与预后指标。结果:孤立性EPN占全部坏死性胰腺炎的22.0%(26/118),孤立性EPN组与EPN+PPN组在年龄、性别、体重指数(body mass index,BMI)、病因学类型、一过性器官功能衰竭发生率、住院时间方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。孤立性EPN组入院24 h APACHE II评分(7.4±1.8 vs 8.5±1.7)、发病1周CT严重指数(6.3±1.8 vs 7.5±2.2)、坏死组织继发感染比例(23.1% vs 48.9%)、持续性器官功能衰竭比例(23.1% vs 47.8%)、有创干预比例(26.9% vs 54.3%)、ICU入住时间[(13.5±4.0) d vs (16.5±4.8) d]、病死率(7.7% vs 26.1%)方面显著低于EPN+PPN组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:AP孤立性EPN与合并PPN具有不同的临床预后,孤立性EPN病情较轻、并发症较少、整体预后较好。
关键词: 胰腺炎;急性坏死性;胰周组织坏死;胰腺实质坏死

Clinical and prognostic characteristics of extrapancreatic necrosis with or without pancreatic parenchymal necrosis in acute pancreatitis

Authors: 1HUANG Haijin, 2JIAO Feng, 2ZHONG Yanyang
1 Department of General Surgery, Hongze District People’s Hospital of Huai’an, Huai’an Jiangsu 223100, China
2 Department of General Surgery, the 82nd Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, Huai’an Jiangsu 223001, China

CorrespondingAuthor: JIAO Feng Email: hapwk@sina.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.08.014

Foundation: This work was supported by the Youth Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (81600689).

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical and prognostic features of extrapancreatic necrosis (EPN) with or without pancreatic parenchyma necrosis (PPN) in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: A series of 118 cases of acute necrotizing pancreatitis were retrospectively analyzed from January 2013 to April 2018. According to CT imaging evaluation, 26 cases belong to isolated EPN without PPN (EPN group), and 92 cases belong to EPN combined with PPN (EPN + PPN group). The demographic characteristics, clinical and prognostic indicators were compared between the two groups. Results: The ratio of isolated EPN to necrotizing pancreatitis was 22.0% (26/118) in this series. There was no significant difference in age, gender, body mass index, etiological type, the incidence of transient organ failure and hospital stay between the EPN group and the EPN + PPN group (P>0.05). The APACHE II score at 24 h after admission (7.4±1.8 vs 8.5±1.7), CT severe index in the first week of onset (6.3±1.8 vs 7.5±2.2), ratio of primary infected necrosis (23.1% vs 48.9%), ratio of persistent organ failure (23.1% vs 47.8%), ratio of invasive intervention (26.9% vs 54.3%), ICU stay [(13.5±4.0) d vs (16.5±4.8 d)] and mortality (7.7% vs 26.1%) were significantly lower than those in EPN+PPN group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The clinical and prognostic features of EPN with or without PPN are different. The isolated EPN is mild, with fewer complications and better overall prognosis.
Keywords: pancreatitis; acute necrotizing; extrapancreatic necrosis; pancreatic parenchyma necrosis

文章选项