表浅型食管鳞癌发生淋巴结转移的危险因素
作者: |
1陆恒,
1施慧,
1汪芳裕
1 第二军医大学南京临床医学院(中国人民解放军南京总医院)消化内科,南京 210002 |
通讯: |
汪芳裕
Email: wangfy65@nju.edu.cn |
DOI: | 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.08.010 |
基金: | 国家自然科学基金项目青年基金(81302162)。 |
摘要
目的:分析表浅型食管鳞癌(superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,SESCC)发生淋巴结转移(lymph node metastasis,LNM)与临床病理特征的关系,探讨SESCC发生LNM的相关危险因素。方法:回顾性分析2013年1月至2017年6月于南京军区总医院行手术治疗的215例SESCC患者,分析患者的性别、年龄、肿瘤部位、肿瘤大小、大体分型、分化程度、浸润深度、脉管癌栓浸润等临床病理特征。采用单因素分析SESCC LNM与其临床病理特征间的关系,采用logistic回归模型分析SESCC发生LNM的独立危险因素。结果:215例SESCC患者中有21例有LNM,淋巴结转移率为9.8%。单因素分析显示肿瘤最大直径、肿瘤浸润深度、组织学分化程度、脉管癌栓浸润与SESCC LNM具有相关性(均P<0.05)。采用logistic回归模型进行多因素分析结果显示,肿瘤最大直径、分化程度、浸润深度、脉管癌栓浸润均是SESCC发生LNM的独立危险因素(OR分别为5.632,5.570,5.401,4.316,均P<0.05)。结论:肿瘤最大直径、分化程度、浸润深度、脉管癌栓浸润均与SESCC LNM密切相关,术前需充分评估LNM的风险,选择最佳的治疗方法。
关键词:
表浅型食管癌;淋巴结转移;临床病理特征;危险因素
Risk factors of lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
CorrespondingAuthor: WANG Fangyu Email: wangfy65@nju.edu.cn
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2018.08.010
Foundation: This work was supported by the Youth Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation, China (81302162).
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the relationship between lymph node metastasis (LNM) and clinicopathological features in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC), and to explore the risk factors of LNM in SESCC. Methods: A total of 215 SESCC patients who underwent curative esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy in Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command from January 2013 to June 2017, were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological features of patients’ gender, age, tumor location, tumor size, macroscopic type, differentiation degree, depth of tumor invasion and lymphovascular invasion were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate analysis was used to analyze the relationship between LNM and the clinicopathological features in SESCC. Logistic regression analysis was taken to analyze the independent risk factors of LNM in SESCC. Results: Among 215 patients with SESCC, 21 patients had LNM, the metastasis rate was 9.8%. Univariate analysis showed that the tumor size, depth of invasion, differentiation degree, and lymphovascular invasion were correlated with LNM in SESCC (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the tumor size, tumor differentiation, depth of invasion, lymphovascular invasion were all independent risk factors for LNM in SESCC (OR were 5.632, 5.570, 5.401, 4.316 respectively, all P<0.05). Conclusion: The tumor size, tumor differentiation, depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion are closely correlated with LNM in SESCC. The risk of LNM in SESCC must be fully assessed to choose the optimal treatment.
Keywords:
superficial esophageal; lymph node metastasis; clinicopathological features; risk factors