文章摘要

替吉奥单药对比吉西他滨单药一线治疗老年晚期胰腺癌的临床研究

作者: 1徐海源, 1徐燕, 1周丽娜, 1陈敏斌
1 江苏大学附属昆山市第一人民医院肿瘤科,江苏 昆山215300
通讯: 陈敏斌 Email: cmb1981@163.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2014.05.025
基金: 国家自然科学基金, 81108676

摘要

目的:比较替吉奥单药与吉西他滨单药一线治疗老年人晚期胰腺癌的近期疗效、无进展生存和安 全性。方法:回顾性分析我院自2009年1月-2014年8月收治的老年晚期胰腺癌患者44例,一线采用 替吉奥单药或吉西他滨单药化疗。替吉奥组21例,吉西他滨组23例。每例患者至少接受化疗2个周 期以上,化疗周期数2~6个。每2个周期复查CT,根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)和美国国家癌 症研究所化疗毒性分级标准(NCI-CTC AE)对两组治疗的近期疗效、无进展生存(PFS)和不良反应 进行评估。结果: 44例老年晚期胰腺癌患者经替吉奥或吉西他滨单药化疗,两组的有效率(ORR) 及疾病控制率(DCR)相似,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。替吉奥组中位PFS3.6月,吉西他滨组中位 PFS4.0月,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。替吉奥组的骨髓抑制情况明显低于吉西他滨组,其中中性 粒细胞减少差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。其它的药物相关不良反应主要为1-2级胃肠道反应和肝功 能异常。结论:替吉奥单药对比吉西他滨单药一线治疗老年晚期胰腺癌,两组疗效相似,但替吉 奥的化疗毒性反应明显较小,患者能耐受,口服给药方便,可推荐作为老年晚期胰腺癌的一线化 疗方案,尤其可能适用于PS评分2分的不能耐受吉西他滨或其他联合方案的老年晚期胰腺癌患者。
关键词: 替吉奥 吉西他滨 胰腺癌 老年人

Clinical study of S-1 alone compared to gemcitabine alone in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer

Authors: 1XU Haiyuan, 1XU Yan, 1ZHOU Lina, 1CHEN Minbin
1 Department of Medical Oncology, Kunshan First People’s Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University, Kunshan Jiangsu 215300, China

CorrespondingAuthor: CHEN Minbin Email: cmb1981@163.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2014.05.025

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare the clinical efficacy and adverse effect of S-1 alone and gemcitabine alone in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: A total of 44 elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were included in the study, who received S-1 alone (n=21) or gemcitabine alone (n=23). RECIST was used to assess the efficacy of the treatment and NCI CTC-AE version was used to describe adverse events. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups (P>0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.6 months in S-1 group and 4.0 months in gemcitabine group, which had no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The drug-related neutropenia in S-1 group was lower than in gemcitabine group, which had statistically significant difference (P=0.01). Other drug-related adverse events were gastrointestinal response and abnormal liver function most of witch were grade 1 to 2. Conclution: S-1 may be recommended as first-line chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer because of its safety, efficacy and convenience, especially for elderly patients with PS 2 who could not tolerate gemcitabine or other combination programmes.

文章选项