文章摘要

格拉斯哥昏迷- 瞳孔反应评分在ICU 重型颅脑损伤患者中的 临床应用价值

作者: 1余菲, 1张琳
1 安徽医科大学第三附属医院重症医学科,合肥 230001
通讯: 张琳 Email: 2005202zhl@sina.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.01.018

摘要

目的:探究格拉斯哥-瞳孔反应(Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil Response,GCS-P)评分在重症医学科(ICU)重型颅脑损伤(severe traumatic brain injury,sTBI)患者中的临床实用价值。方法:通过回顾安徽医科大学第三附属医院ICU收治的160名sTBI患者的一般资料,分析GCS评分、P评分、GCS-P评分分别与28 d病死率、根据伤后第3个月GOS预后评分评估的不良预后比例的相关性。 结果:GCS评分、P评分、GCS-P评分均与患者的28 d病死率及伤后第3个月不良预后比例呈负相关。GCS-P评分与病死率、不良预后比例的相关系数均大于GCS评分。GCS评分与GCS-P评分分值相同时,除4分外,GCS-P评分评估出的病死率及不良预后比例更高。GCS评分3分患者病死率及不良预后比例低于GCS评分4分患者,这一结果在GCS-P评分中未观察到。结论:GCS-P评分与病死率及不良预后比例的相关性优于GCS评分,比GCS评分能提供更多信息,评价范围更大,且简单实用,对临床快速评估颅脑损伤患者病情及预后具有重要价值。
关键词: 重型颅脑损伤;GCS评分;瞳孔反应

Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil Response score’s clinical value in patients with severe brain injury in intensive care unit

Authors: 1YU Fei, 1ZHANG Lin
1 Department of Intensive Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230001, China

CorrespondingAuthor: ZHANG Lin Email: 2005202zhl@sina.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2019.01.018

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupil Response (GCS-P) score in patients with severe brain injury in intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: We reviewed the general data of 160 patients with severe brain injury admitted to ICU in our hospital, and analyzed the correlation between GCS score, P score, GCS-P score and 28-day mortality rate, and the unfavorable late outcomes on the GOS score in the 3rd month after injury. Results: Separately, the GCS score, P score, and GCS-P score were each negatively correlated with the 28-day mortality rate and the unfavorable late outcomes on the GOS score in the 3rd month after injury. The correlation coefficient between GCS-P score and mortality rate and unfavorable late outcomes rate was greater than GCS score. When the GCS score is the same as the GCS-P score, in addition to 4 points, the GCS-P score has a higher mortality rate and unfavorable late outcomes rate. Patients with a GCS score of 3 points had a lower mortality rate and a lower unfavorable late outcomes rate than patients with a GCS score of 4 points. But the result was not observed in the GCS-P score. Conclusion: The correlation between GCS-P score and mortality rate and unfavorable late outcomes rate is better than GCS score. It provides more information than GCS score. The evaluation scope is larger, and it is simple and practical. It is of great value for clinical rapid assessment of the condition and prognosis of patients with brain injury.
Keywords: severe brain injury; Glasgow Coma Scale score; pupil response

文章选项