文章摘要

ABCDE镇静镇痛策略对重症机械通气患者呼吸力学的影响

作者: 1胡惠娟, 1黄国敏, 1区智凤
1 佛山市中医院重症医学科,广东 佛山 528000
通讯: 胡惠娟 Email: ht13690406860@126.com
DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2017.04.018
基金: 佛山市卫生局课题基金项目, 2012134

摘要

目的:探讨ABCDE镇痛镇静策略对重症机械通气(mechanical ventilation,MV)患者呼吸力学的影响。方法:根据转入ICU时间顺序对重症MV患者进行分组,其中对照组采用常规镇痛镇静方案,观察组采用ABCDE镇痛镇静干预策略,收集并比较两组在干预前(T0)和干预后第1(T1),3(T2),5(T3),7(T4)天的呼吸力学参数变化情况,以及患者治疗预后情况。结果:两组在不同时间点的呼吸力学参数比较,观察组在T2~T4的气道峰压(Ppeak)、平台压(Pplat)、动态顺应性(Cdny)及潮气量(tidal volume,VT)均较T0明显改善,且改善效果明显优于同期对照组(P<0.05);重复测量方差分析结果显示其组内效应、时间效应及交互效应差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在治疗预后各指标比较方面,观察组的MV时间、ICU停留天数明显缩短,28 d生存率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:ABCDE镇痛镇静策略是一种安全有效的干预策略,可有效降低重症MV患者的气道压力,增加VT和提升肺部的动态顺应性,对于促进治疗预后具有积极的推动作用。
关键词: 镇静 镇痛 重症患者 机械通气 集束化干预 呼吸力学

Influence of ABCDE analgesic and sedative strategy on breathing mechanics of severe mechanical ventilation patients

Authors: 1HU Huijuan, 1HUANG Guomin, 1OU Zhifeng
1 Intensive Care Unit, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Foshan Guangdong 528000, China

CorrespondingAuthor: HU Huijuan Email: ht13690406860@126.com

DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2095-6959.2017.04.018

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the influence of ABCDE analgesic and sedative strategy on breathing mechanics of severe mechanical ventilation (MV) patients. Methods: The severe MV patients were divided into the observation group and the control group according to the ICU hospitalization sequence. The control group adopted routine analgesic and sedative nursing strategy while the observation group adopted ABCDE analgesic and sedative nursing strategy. The changes of breathing mechanics parameter before intervention (T0) and on the first day (T1), third day (T2), fifth day (T3) and seventh day (T4) after intervention as well as treatment prognosis of the patients of the two groups were collected and compared. Results: As indicated by the comparison of breathing mechanics parameters of the two groups at different time points, airway peak pressure (Ppeak), platform pressure (Pplat), dynamic compliance (Cdny) and tidal volume (VT) at T2–T4 of the observation group were improved evidently in contrast to those at T0; and the improvement effect was better than that of the control group in the corresponding period. The differences were of statistical significance (P<0.05). As indicated by the further repeated measurement variance analysis results, inter-group effect, time effect and interaction effect of the above indexes at different time were of statistical significance. According to the comparison of various treatment prognosis parameters, MV time and ICU hospitalization time of the observation group were shorter than those of the control group. The 28-day survival rate of the observation group was evidently higher than that of the control group. The differences were of statistical significance (P<0.05). Conclusion: ABCDE analgesic and sedative strategy is a safe and effective intervention strategy. It can effectively reduce the airway pressure of severe MV patients, increase the tidal volume and increase the lung dynamic compliance. It plays a positive role in promoting the treatment prognosis.

文章选项